This page is under construction
If you can, add information under the following headings (the underlined headings take you to the section below - do not add to the underlined headings - add to the section to which they take you). Include a brief summary.
(Some links will naturally be included under more than one heading - put them in all appropriate places)
Educational handouts that we have/will distribute
Corporate personhood history
Anti-Corporate personhood actions/measures
Income & wealth inequality/taxation
Elections/Campaign Finance
Multinationals/Outsourcing/Trade policy
Organizations with goals related to ours
Training Resources
Books of Interest
Editorials, blogs, and articles
Right Wing Propaganda
Documents and links not yet sorted
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Educational handouts that we have distributed
1. Corporate Bribery – from Alliance for Democracy
Corporate bribery description with claims of the effects of Citizens United on the 2010 election. Distributed by David and commented on by Fergus. Also on PBworks as a 2 page flier 8.5" x 14" (pdf)
2. Our Hidden Corporate History – from Reclaim Democracy
This overview of the rise of corporate power in the U.S. Also available as a 2 page flier with our contact information (pdf)
3. Inherent rules of corporate behavior – from Reclaim Democracy
Primer based on Jerry Mander’s ideas from In the Absence of the Sacred, this is also available as a 2 page flier with our contact information (pdf)
4. Hidden History of Corporate Rule - from Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County
A primer that starts with the corporate history of England's conquest of America, goes through to Citizens United v. FEC. The word document that we distributed can be download here
5. Why Abolish All Corporate Constitutional Rights - from POCLAD (Program on Corporations, Law & Democracy)
Argument that goes through many of the amendments that have been used by corporations to claim illegitimate rights. This is also available as a 2 page flier (pdf). A separate document can be cut and pasted onto this to include our contact information.
6. House Joint Memorial 9
A resolution introduced in the Oregon legislature by Phil Barnhart in the 2011 session that addresses the Citizens United decision. Unfortunately, the resolution died in committee.
7. March 30 town hall
8. Paul Cienfuegos May 16 teach-in
9. We the People introductory flyer
10. City resolution flyer (word)
11. Pamphlet prepared by Colin Farnsworth (pdf) - as a Word document
12. Lesson plan for a high school class prepared by Colin Farnsworth (pdf) - as a Word document
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Corporate personhood history
1. Our Hidden Corporate History – from Reclaim Democracy
This overview of the rise of corporate power in the U.S. also is available as a 2 page flier with our contact information (pdf), (a great handout that we have used).
2. Inherent rules of corporate behavior – from Reclaim Democracy
Primer based on Jerry Mander’s ideas from In the Absence of the Sacred, this is also available as a 2 page flier with our contact information (pdf), (a great handout that we have used).
3. How corporations became 'persons' - from uuworld.org
"The amazing true story of a legal fiction that undermines American democracy". By Tom Stites May/June 2003
4. Timeline of Personhood Rights and Powers - by Jan Edwards (pdf)
5. 'Unequal Protection, Part I: Corporations Take Over' - Thom Hartmann's story on TruthOut (from Stan Taylor)
Focuses on corporate personhood's history and has a short video on how the court reporter inserted the headnote that created corporate personhood in the 1886 Santa Clara v Southern Pacific Railroad case. We the People committees should read the article and watch the video. See also related link 2 to court reporter issue or link 3 to court reporter issue or link 4 to court reporter issue
6. Abolish Corporate Personhood by Molly Morgan (9/21/2001)
Talk presented at a community meeting in Santa Cruz, California. Anyone is free to use this talk, or any portion of it, in their outreach to educate people about corporate personhood
7. How corporate personhood arose through Supreme Court Decisions - by James and Tomilea Allison
8. Our dream of democracy for the United States – video of talk by David Cobb
This talk is long (2 hours) but is worth the time. It is a general civics and history lesson with emphasis on the authority to rule (the word "people" or "person" appears in the Constitution over 25 times, whereas the word "corporation" never appears).
9. TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS: Citizenship and the Charter of Incorporation
A 1993 article by Richard L. Grossman and Frank T. Adams. "Yet the history of constitutional law is, as former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter said, 'the history of the impact of the modern corporation upon the American scene'." This was a pamphlet that Paul Cienfuegos suggested, and which I bought for our group at his event.
10. "Working Paper on Rights-based Activism and Organizing" WorkingPaper_Rights-basedActivism.pdf
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Anti-corporate personhood actions/measures
1. Ordinance to Deny Corporate Personhood : Oregon - from Fergus - PDF version
2. April 11, 2011
- In Madison and Dane County, Wisconsin, voters passed two separate resolutions to support a United States Constitutional Amendment that would declare that only human beings are entitled to Constitutional rights.
- In Ft. Bragg, California, the City Council passed a resolution calling for an amendment to ban corporate personhood.
- In Minnesota, a bill has been introduced proposing an amendment to the state constitution that defines an individual as a natural person. Vermont and Washington are also considering corporate personhood restrictions.
- The City Council in Richmond, California, unanimously passed a resolution calling for state and federal constitutional amendments to reject corporate personhood and corporations’ ability to spend freely in elections.
3. Spokane Community Bill of Rights Initiative
March 23, 20011 The amendments to the city’s charter would allow neighborhoods greater control over proposed development, strengthen protections for the Spokane River and aquifer, and protect workers constitutional rights. The Bill of Rights would also limit the legal powers of corporate interests when they try to interfere with the enforcement of these rights. The full language along with additional material on the Community Bill of Rights can be found at www.envisionspokane.org.
5. Nine Laws Congress could pass today to Offset Citizens United Decision
6. RICHMOND, CA: City Council Votes to Adopt Resolution Calling for Constitutional Amendment to End Corporate Personhood - Wed, 03/02/2011
7. 125 Communities Take On Corporate Personhood Feb 7, 2011
8. "Working Paper on Rights-based Activism and Organizing" WorkingPaper_Rights-basedActivism.pdf
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Income & wealth inequality/taxation
1. Unnecessary Austerity, Unnecessary Shutdown - summary of report from the Institute for Policy Studies
The full report can be viewed by clicking the report button above the summary. I will also upload it to PBworks shortly. This is one of the best articles that I have seen that addresses the issue of taxes to fund America.
Key Tax Facts (differences in 50 years)
- 15,753: The number of households in 1961 with $1 million in taxable income (adjusted for inflation). These millionaires paid 43.1% of income in taxes (in 1961)
- 361,000: The number of households in 2011 estimated to have $1 million in taxable income. These millionaires will likely pay 23.1% of income in taxes (in 2011). [Paying at the 1961 rate would generate $230 billion in revenue - calculation by Charlie S]
- 47.4: % of profits corporations paid in taxes in 1961. 11.1% is expected taxation of corporate profits in 2011
2. Thomas Pogge on the Past, Present and Future of Global Poverty
Director of the Global Justice Program at Yale University, with a PhD in philosophy from Harvard, discusses structural problems that have led to increases in income inequality, argues that poverty has almost nothing to do with an average lack of resources, and promotes a restructuring of pharmaceutical delivery to poor regions (the Health Impact Fund or HIF). Along the way he talks about excessive corporate influence in the regulatory and political arenas.
3. Spreading the wealth - (from Dan Weiner)
The gap between rich and poor in the U.S. is bigger than at any time since the 1920s. Is that really what most Americans want?
4. Fast Track to Inequality
Bob Herbert's article about the book "Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer -- and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class." by Hacker & Pierson
5. Why Are We Afraid to Tax the Super-Rich? - Article by Les Leopold on Alternet
6. It's the Inequality Stupid - Lots of good data relating to inequality (from Mother Jones)
Top 1% have 34.6% of wealth, next 9% have 38.5% of wealth, bottom 90% have 26.9% of wealth
7. "Super-rich have seen their tax liability tumble"
The top 400 tax filers (in 2007) had an average income of $345 million and paid 17% in income taxes - compared to 26% in the very low tax year of 1992
8. Trump's tax proposal
In 1999, Donald Trump (yes, the Republican front runner!) proposed a net wealth tax on those with more than $10 million in net worth. The tax was to be a modest 14.25%, and would have raised enough money ($5.7 trillion) to completely eliminate our whole national debt. Would those with $500 million really be that badly hurt if instead they only had $430 million? Let's hope that he still wants such a tax.
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Elections/Campaign Finance
1. WashClean.org
2. Democracy in America Is a Useful Fiction
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Multinationals/Outsourcing/Trade policy
1. Coalition for a Prosperous America - An organization working for reasonable trade policies
Ian Stewart (author of Free Trade Doesn't Work ) is the senior economist for this organization
Thom Hartmann's interview with Ian Stewart - one of Hartmann's Conversations with Great Minds (excellent discussion)
2. Note that some prominent conservatives oppose (or have opposed) free trade
Donald Trump is against Korea Free Trade agreement, Patrick Buchanan was against most free trade, Ross Perot was against NAFTA
3. Democracy Now interview with Ha-joon Chang
Ha-joon Chang is a University of Cambridge Economist and author of "The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism"
4. "Working Paper on Rights-based Activism and Organizing" WorkingPaper_Rights-basedActivism.pdf
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Organizations with goals related to ours
1. Local organizations
a. We the People - Eugene – us!
b. ESSN – Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network
c. CALC – Community Alliance of Lane County
d. Eugene PeaceWorks
e. WAND – Women's Action for New Directions
f. DPLC – Democratic Party of Lane County
g. OSPIRG at LCC
2. Anti-corporate personhood or corporate rule organizations
a. Move to Amend
b. Reclaim Democracy
c. Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County
d. POCLAD - Program on Corporations, Law & Democracy
e. Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
f. WILPF – Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
g. Free Speech for the People
h. Liberty Tree : Foundation for the Democratic Revolution
i. The Alliance for Democracy
j. Common Cause
k. Progressives United – founded by Russ Feingold
l. Corporate Accountability International - campaigns against corporate control of food and water
m. Bioneers - The organization to which David Linzey and Mari Margil gave talks (posted under training) and to which Paul Cienfuegos directed us.
n. New Rules Project - A project to "design rules as if community matters". (community broadband, banking, and energy sources)
3. Election reform organizations (that are not directly anti-corporate personhood in general)
a. Fair Elections Now - Public Financing of Campaigns
b. Public Citizen - working to get corporate money out of elections, perhaps public financing of campaigns
c. National Popular Vote - end run around electoral college - states allocate electoral votes to popular vote winner
4. from David Cobb Move to Amend url for affiliation materials and other resources
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Training resources
1. The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund : Democracy School
Democracy School videos that we should all look at.
2. Talks from Paul Cienfuegos' 5/24 email to us
Thomas Linzey Bioneer talk – part 1
Thomas Linzey Bioneer talk – part 2
Thomas Linzey Bioneer talk – part 3
Thomas Linzey Bioneer talk – part 4
Mari Margil Bioneer talk – part 1
Mari Margil Bioneer talk – part 2
Mari Margil Bioneer talk – part 3
Thomas Linzey – maintaining control over resources – part 1
Thomas Linzey – maintaining control over resources – part 2
Thomas Linzey – maintaining control over resources – part 3
Thomas Linzey – challenging corporations
Interview of Thomas Linzey and Mari Margil at Bioneers (2009)
3. Information about measure T - Humboldt County's attempt (overturned) to prohibit non-local corporations from contributing to local political campaigns
Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County model for systemic social change
Article from YES magazine about measure T
Measure T is enjoined by the Federal Court
4. Move to Amend Monthly Webinar
These meetings on the 1st Tuesday of each month will be an opportunity to for folks to connect with Move to Amend for organizing tools and to network with other local organizers across the country
.
5. Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Corporations v. Democracy Downloads entire 10-session Study Guide
6. creatingdemocracy.org Training Library
7. Working Paper on Rights-based Activism and Organizing (pdf) - Robert Beal's working paper
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Books of Interest
1. Richard Wikinson & Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger, (Bloomsbury Press, New York, 2009)
This book by epidemiologists is a collection of data showing the negative effect of income/wealth inequality on many aspects of life in the 23 richest countries (of which the U.S. is the most unequal, and by some measures the wealthiest – at least in the top 5 in wealth by most measures). Inequality affects not only the poor, but even the wealthy of the rich, unequal countries. The book gives detailed data relating to the level of trust, mental illness, life expectancy, infant mortality, obesity, children's educational performance, teenage births, homicides, imprisonment, and social mobility.
2. Ha-Joon Chang, 23 Things They Don't Tell You about Capitalism, (Bloomsbury Press, New York, 2010)
Chang is an economist at the University of Cambridge. Although a strong supporter of capitalism, Chang says (as Churchill quoted about democracy) that capitalism is the worst economic system except all the others. Chang is very critical of free market capitalists. Chang gives one of the best economic arguments that I have seen against free trade and for regulation of businesses, especially finance.
3. Thom Hartmann, Rebooting the American Dream: 11 Ways to Rebuild Our Country, (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2010)
The latest of many good books by Hartmann. This is a hopeful book, with good arguments against free trade and corporate personhood.
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Editorials, blogs, and articles
From We the People – Eugene and friends
1. Corporations Are NOT Persons: Why I’m Liberal #3
Seda Collier (who found us at Saturday Market petitioning) blog – 2/9/10
2. Federal budget cutting ignores fattest part - the military
Susan Cundiff (of WAND and DPLC) Register Guard op-ed – 2/24/11
3. Corporate rule and taxes
Charlie Swanson letter to the Register Guard – 4/4/11 (actually later)
4. Use solar, wind, not biomass
Dave Piccioni letter to the Register Guard – 5/7/11
5. Tax break specialists at work
Robert Beal letter to the Register Guard – 5/18/11
From national sources
1. Financial Meltdown: The Greatest Transfer of Wealth in History
Ellen Brown Global Research article - 10/17/08
2. America Is NOT Broke
Michael Moore Truthout article - 3/7/11
3. America’s real national deficit is a moral one
William Pfaff Register Guard op-ed - 4/14/11
4. Democrats Sue to Force U.S. Election Agency to Reveal Political Donations
Eric Lichtblau New York Times editorial – 4/21/11
5. The Global Economy's Corporate Crime Wave
Jeffrey Sachs Register Guard op-ed - 5/5/11
6. The IMF's Switch in Time
Joseph Stiglitz Register Guard op-ed - 5/6/11
7. Secret Donors Multiply in U.S. Election Spending
J. Crewdson, A. Fitzgerald, J. Salant and C. Babcock Bloomberg News article – 5/19/11
8. The Great Switch by the Super Rich: How Wealthy Americans Started Paying So Little in Taxes
Robert Reich alternet.org article - 5/20/11
9. 10 Steps to Defeat the Corptocracy
Bruce Levine alternet.org article - 5/20/11
10. The Real IMF Assault
Nomi Prins Truthdig.com article – 5/20/11
11. "The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You”
Eli Pariser, former executive director of MoveOn.org, argues that search engine's personalization of web searches adds to our political polarization.
12. Bill Moyers gives the Howard Zinn lecture at Boston University, "Welcome to the Plutocracy" on 10/29/10.
This was broadcast on Alternative Radio on Tuesday, 5/31/11. Here is the lecture in print. An audio version can be heard here. And a video version is here. – the video has more in it, including video of Howard Zinn and Q & A. Bill Moyers admits his bias: "Plutocracy and democracy don’t mix". Near the end of the speech Moyers addresses Citizens United and the potential for a broad based coalition to fight the plutocracy.
13. "Against Sustainablility" (pdf) - as a Word document
Ben Hill (LCC math department) argues that the way we use the word sustainability lead to intellectual mischief, essentially thinking we are doing good for the natural world when, at best, we are helping humans in the medium term. This is useful reading for all that wish to address sustainability
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Right Wing Propaganda
1. ALEC Exposed - Information about ALEC, the right-wing legislative writing body
to top of page
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Documents and links not yet sorted
from Robert - Top 4 Victories Handed to Corporate America by the Supreme Court -- So Far
From Ruth Miller -
State Pay to Play Laws
Pay to Play Blog
As You Sow -- encouraging Corporate Responsibility
Commonly asked questions regarding the Oregon State Legislature, legislative process, and other government agencies
Oct 14, 2010 This election season, enterprising journalists, especially at the New York Times, have been digging into the shell game of contributions and spending, including activities by theAmerican Future Fund, Crossroads GPS, and Americans for Job Security. The most important piece the Times has run, by Mike McIntire, demonstrated in vivid detail just how hard it is to follow the money without disclosure rules strongly enforced by the government.* As McIntire explains, after his extensive investigation into the backers of the "Coalition to Protect Seniors" led him to P.O. boxes and unanswered e-mails, it looked as if the health care industry might be behind an ad the group ran attacking the president's health care plan. But in all likelihood, we'll never know for sure. That's how porous our disclosure rules have become.
Super PACs are a new kind of political action committee created in July 2010 following the outcome of federal court case concerning campaign finance issues and known as SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission. Technically knowns as independent expenditure-only committees, Super PACs may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates. Super PACs must, however, report their donors to the Federal Election Commission on a monthly or quarterly basis -- the Super PAC's choice -- as a traditional PAC would.
The five justices in the majority in Citizens United, last year’s campaign finance blockbuster, appeared poised on Monday to strike down an Arizona law that provides matching funds to candidates who accept public financing
to top of page
Blumberg, Phillip I. "The Corporate Personality in American Law: A Summary Review." The American Journal of Comparative Law: Supplement. U.S. Law in an Era of Democratization (American Society of Camparative Law) 38 (1990): 49-69.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commision. 08-205 (U.S. Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog January 21, 2010).
"Constitutional Rights of the Corporate Person." The Yale Law Journal (The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.) 91, no. 8 (July 1982): 1641-1658.
Irons, Peter. A People's History of the Supreme Court. New York: The Penguin Group, 1999.
Mark, Gregory A. "The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law." The University of Chicago Law Review (University of Chicago Law Review) 54, no. 4 (Autumn 1987): 1441-1483.
Nace, Ted. Gangs of America: The Ride of Corporate Power and the Disabling of America. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2003.
Ribstein, Larry E. "The Constitutional Conception of the Corporation." Supreme Court Economic Review (The University of Chicago Press) 4 (1995): 95-140.
Corporate Personhood Quotes (right click and open in new window)
http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?CorporatePersonhood
Progressives United
Corporate Accountability International
Talk - David Cobb & Riki Ott - Organizing Community to Abolish Corporate Personhood
Debating 'Citizens United'
By Floyd Abrams and Burt Neuborne
First Published by The Nation January 13, 2011
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2011/neuborne_abrams_debate_cu_fec.php
News and Commentary on CU v FEC
and the Movement to Overrule the Court
March-April 2010
Judging for Dollars -- The New Republic, April 3, 2010
What the Founding Fathers Really Thought About Corporations --Harvard Business Review, April 1, 2010
Reform Is Needed To Stop Us From Going Down The Rabbit Hole Of Corporate Spending -- The Wonk Room blog, April 1, 2010
Citizens United Challenges the Strident Side of Supreme Court Ruling-- The Washington Post, April 1, 2010
In the Wake of CU, States Consider Alternatives to Judicial Elections -- USA Today, March 31, 2010
They Still Don't Get It -- Constitutional Accountability Center/Text & History, March 19, 2010
West Virginia Moves on Corporate Campaign Finance Disclosure -- Brennan Center for Justice, March 19, 2010
Greenhouse Discusses Supreme Court -- The Flat Hat, March 19, 2010
Comments Filed on Antitrust a Window on Ag Business -- Daily Yonder, March 18, 2010
My Bad!: The Supreme Court's Assault on Judicial Elections -- Concurring Opinions, March 17, 2010
Study Shows Money Flooding into Campaigns for State Judgehips -- ABC News, March 17, 2010
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Sets Sights on Democrats Ahead of Midterm Elections -- The Washington Post, March 16, 2010
Citizens United and Congressional Earmarks -- Constitutional Accountability Center/Text & History, March 15, 2010
States can limit corporate and union spending on elections -- The Washington Post, March 13, 2010
California Legislature Introduces Resolution Calling for Constitutional Amendment -- Free Speech for People, March 3, 2010
Iowa Senate Didn't Go Far Enough with Rules on Speech for Corporations -- Ames Tribune, March 2, 2010

Justice Rising is AfD's quarterly newsletter, a thematic guide for everyone dedicated to ending corporate rule and establishing true democracy. Scroll down for past newsletters.
http://www.thealliancefordemocracy.org/newsletters.html
to top of page
Comments (23)
robertbeal said
at 9:16 am on Feb 9, 2011
From http://www.alternet.org/water/149725/vision%3A_how_small%2C_mostly_conservative_towns_have_found_the_trick_to_defeating_corporations/?page=entire:
"The hardest places to work are the liberal progressive communities because they think we have a democracy and they are intent on working within the existing structure to try to find a remedy rather than tossing it and working on something from scratch," said Linzey.
"What's been fascinating to me is when you have south and north-central Pennsylvania towns passing binding local ordinances that refuse to endow corporations with constitutional rights in their communities. But in the liberal progressive bastion of Berkeley, they were passing non-binding resolutions urging Congress to do something about it. I think that difference in approach has become clear to me over the last decade. Here are rural conservatives passing things saying we won't let our rights be taken away and are using a local law as a municipal, collective civil disobedience tool to actually push up against the state to say 'fuck you.'
"Whereas in Berkeley people get in a huff and do some hand-wringing and pass a resolution which begs and pleads Congress to do something about corporate rights, which is never going to happen, at least in the next 20-30 years."
Ruth Miller said
at 9:32 am on Feb 9, 2011
Well said. We can still use the local resolution as an educating the general public tool - but we definitely don't want to stop there.
robertbeal said
at 9:49 am on Feb 9, 2011
Hightower recommends:
http://www.freespeechforpeople.org/
From:
http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/149808/hightower%3A_join_the_resistance_against_the_right-wing_multi-billionaire_koch_brothers/
Ruth Miller said
at 3:03 pm on Feb 13, 2011
The documents appear to include pitches for unseemly ways to undermine adversaries of Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, like doing background research on their critics and then distributing fake documents to embarrass them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/12/us/politics/12hackers.html?_r=1&hp
Ruth Miller said
at 3:04 pm on Feb 13, 2011
A growing number of states are rewriting their rules on selecting judges to curb the influence of special interests on judicial contests.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2010-03-30-judges_N.htm
Ruth Miller said
at 3:09 pm on Feb 13, 2011
http://www.theusconstitution.org/upload/fck/file/File_storage/A%20Capitalist%20Joker.pdf
A CAPITALIST JOKER
The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past and Uncertain Future of Corporate Personhood in American Law
Ruth Miller said
at 8:50 pm on Feb 13, 2011
THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY
U of O School of Law - http://www.acslaw.org/chapters/student/oregon
Portland - http://www.acslaw.org/chapters/lawyer/oregon
Ruth Miller said
at 10:59 pm on Feb 13, 2011
OREGON STATE BANK
http://oregoniansforastatebank.org/
Ruth Miller said
at 11:01 pm on Feb 13, 2011
Alliance for Justice
the Corporate Court
http://www.afj.org/connect-with-the-issues/the-corporate-court/
Geoff Barrett said
at 1:13 pm on Feb 17, 2011
Thanks, Ruth...great info here!
Ruth Miller said
at 5:54 pm on Feb 18, 2011
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/374631/february-17-2011/clarence-thomas-s-financial-disclosure-controversy
Colbert on Clarence Thomas
robertbeal said
at 6:19 pm on Feb 21, 2011
From:
http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/149861/top_4_victories_handed_to_corporate_america_by_the_supreme_court_--_so_far/?page=1
"In January 2010, only seven months after they'd sprung their Citizens United surprise, the five issued their constitutional rewrite. It imposes their will (i.e., egos and personal ideological bias) over: (1) the clear intention of our Constitution's framers to keep corporations out of politics; (2) a century of settled congressional law banning corporate funds in elections; (3) the laws of 22 states that prohibit corporate spending in their elections; (4) many decades of the Court's own precedents affirming the wisdom of outlawing corporate electioneering cash; and (5) the overwhelming belief of the American people, that only humans, not corporations, should be election participants."
Ruth Miller said
at 7:03 pm on Feb 21, 2011
great article, Robert. I'll post it in the collection at the top. Looking at actions related to the Supreme Court should be a priority of ours, I think.
robertbeal said
at 4:10 pm on Feb 22, 2011
http://movetoamend.org/events/move-amend-local-action-webinar-4pm-pt-5pm-mt-6pm-ct-7pm-et-registration-required
cswanee said
at 10:01 pm on Mar 1, 2011
A useful new production - http://storyofstuff.org/citizensunited/
The above movie/cartoon is referenced and discussed at http://www.truth-out.org/story-citizens-united-v-fec68121
robertbeal said
at 10:31 am on Mar 6, 2011
"We the People" group name is already "claimed," by an antigovernment "patriot" group with 45 chapters around the country:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2011/spring/active-patriot-groups-in-the-us
Ruth Miller said
at 1:18 pm on Mar 6, 2011
they disbanded -- the domain is for sale for $25K -- wethe peopleeugene or we the peopleoregon are distictive enough but yes, there was an active group with that base name. Since they are no longer active and are actively selling their domain name, their "claim" to the base name may still exist, but wethepeopleeugene.org is our domain and We the People Eugene is our name. If the association with the name We the People as a former right wing group is a concern, this was discussed during our name and logo meetings and the agreement was that we SHOULD take back the name.
Ruth Miller said
at 1:22 pm on Mar 6, 2011
From: "Mr Blonde" <mrblondewtpusa@googlemail.com>
To: <whykie@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:19 PM
Subject: WETHEPEOPLE.ORG
Hi Ruth,
We are currently asking $25,000 or best offer.
The domain name www.wethepeople.org is available. This political site
played a role in the development of the Tea Party movement. The Sons
of Liberty who posted on this site are all ardent patriots who
attended tea parties, gave fodder to the movement, sounded the bugle
call in late 2008, and have worked to give voice to the movement. They
have now closed up shop, believing that the site has served its
purpose and have moved to another project where they will focus on
essays and white papers to help better define and delineate the
political and social views of our movement, and reach out to the
voters in the middle, in hopes that the great center of the American
political spectrum will understand the need for smaller government,
tight fiscal discipline, a powerful military that is used only when
needed, and the need to retain America's unique position in the world,
to promote American Exceptionalism.
www.wethepeople.org developed considerable traffic, plus more traffic
on twitter and Facebook, and was on more than 125 distribution lists.
Regards,
Mr Blonde
LenH said
at 12:17 pm on Apr 2, 2011
Hi, I received my CREDO cell phone bill today and in it I see a letter that CREDO sent to our senator, Jeff Merkley. I was gratefully surprised to find that it was in support of an our position! I was curious about how many letters like the one below were sent to congress so I called CREDO and asked how many subscribers asked for such letters to be sent and the lady said over three million. Nice Support!
CREDO
CitizenLetters You Requested:
Free Speech
Dear Sen. Jeffery A. Merkley,
I am writing to urge you to pledge to support a Constitutional amendment that reserves the right of free speech for people, not corporations.
As you know, when the Supreme Court ruled last year in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, it extended First Amendment rights to corporations, saying they can spend unlimited amounts of money in elections to make their opinions heard.
The decision reversed long-standing rules that prevented corporations from influencing campaigns with massive amounts of cash -- and the result has been a disaster for our democratic process, as evidenced in the election last November. The Supreme Court has effectively turned elections into auctions.
The best way to fix the problem is a Constitutional amendment that makes it clear that corporations are not people and that the right of free speech is reserved for people alone.
I urge you to support a 28th Amendment stating that corporations are not entitled to the same rights as individuals. Please let me know how you intend to address this issue.
cswanee said
at 12:31 pm on Apr 4, 2011
There is a lot of discussion about the responsibility of a corporation - its management is obligated by law to maximize shareholder profit. Here is a link to an article by John Mackey, the CEO of Whole Foods that takes issue with that as a limiting obligation.
http://reason.com/archives/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-social-responsi
In the article, he argues strongly that "... we [Whole Foods] measure our success by how much value we can create for all six of our most important stakeholders: customers, team members (employees), investors, vendors, communities, and the environment." His argument is based on the notion that the entrepreneur(s) who creates the company can define the purpose of the business, and it may include more than maximizing shareholder value (it also may not).
We should make such notions more broadly known. As far as I know, states have the right and obligation to define what they want out of a corporation. Maybe we should push states (Oregon?) to require broader missions than just maximizing profit - I like Mackey's stakeholder list.
cswanee said
at 9:36 pm on Apr 6, 2011
In case you didn't see it, the followingis my letter to the editor that appeared in the Register Guard today (Wednesday 4/6):
Reports that GE paid no U.S. taxes on its more than $5 billion profits from U.S. operations, but instead got a $3.2 billion refund, have drawn lots of appropriate indignation. Arnold Buchman's April 4 letter suggesting that the fault lies with our jerry-built tax code is essentially correct, but he does not point out that one of the main reasons for many of the tax code problems lies with the excessive influence of large corporations in our politics, and therefore in designing our tax code.
Part of the reason for the rise of corporate rule in politics are Supreme Court decisions giving corporate "artificial persons" the Constitutional rights of real people, among the most egregious of these decisions being the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC ruling allowing unlimited corporate contributions to influence our elections. A very important step towards turning this around would be a Constitutional Amendment making clear that corporations do not have the same Constitutional rights as people.
Corporations have been given legal benefits which allow some of them to gain extraordinary economic power, which unfortunately too often becomes political power, and also leads to "too big to fail". Some careful analysts have argued that a major factor in our financial meltdown was that Wall Street partnerships became public corporations, to the harm of all but a very few insiders. Having more non-corporate business organizations, e.g. partnerships and cooperatives, and using anti-trust actions to keep corporations from getting too big, may be beneficial to society.
Fergus Mclean said
at 8:21 am on Apr 9, 2011
letter to the elite from Jesse Ventura:
You control our world. You’ve poisoned the air we breathe, contaminated the water we drink, and copyrighted the food we eat. We fight in your wars, die for your causes, and sacrifice our freedoms to protect you. You’ve liquidated our savings, destroyed our middle class, and used our tax dollars to bailout your unending greed. We are slaves to your corporations, zombies to your airwaves, servants to your decadence. You’ve stolen our elections, assassinated our leaders, and abolished our basic rights as human beings. You own our property, shipped away our jobs, and shredded our unions. You’ve profited off of disaster, destabilized our currencies, and raised our cost of living. You’ve monopolized our freedom, stripped away our education, and have almost extinguished our flame. We are hit… we are bleeding… but we ain’t got time to bleed. We will bring the giants to their knees and you will witness our revolution!
Sincerely,
The Serfs.
robertbeal said
at 9:19 am on Apr 21, 2011
Charlie, the reorganized folder/page (?) looks great. Thanks.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.